Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Maria's avatar

I really like the "Read your color" archetypes and concept, but I am really considering unsubscribing from the newsletter recently. This comment isn't meant to be some rage quitting message, but feedback. Over the years I realised that the literary sphere is plagued by elitism and very specific ideas of what constitutes quality work as well as what is "good reading" or not and I think the over emphasis on such concepts is more detrimental than positive. Historically, ideals of what is quality work, and what is best and what is worse have marginalised voices. I also believe this approach keeps people out of the conversation regarding narratives, interpretation, and what reading can give us. You are being overly preachy and condescending with your constant use of "tiktok is feeding you trash literature" and "bookshops are filled with flashy fast food stories" or whatever. People can make judgements and their own choices without being constantly told their taste is trash. Not only I think it is unfair to compare taste in media to healthy food vs fast food, I also think going for a varied selection of stories (heck even only light literature) is okay. People read for very different reasons and that is okay. Life is harsh enough on people, no need to put more burden on them bringing them down just because they don't want to read certain books, for whatever reason that is. Challenging oneself is good, but a person is not always up for that and that is okay. I really don't want my recommendations to come with a steady harray of " good vs bad " literature remarks. See you around I guess

Expand full comment
SD's avatar

I wasn't sure how I felt about this piece until I got to the end about solving hard problems. I have been frustrated by the political discourse among general citizens of late - e.g. our mayor is "stupid" because there have been several shootings recently or because there are blighted buildings. We should just "hire more police" and "get rid of Raise the Age." Never mind that the police force is already 30% of my city's budget, and that my state was only one of two states that tried 16 and 17 year olds as adults until we passed Raise the Age. People are not willing to consider the complex problems that civic leaders are up against when honestly trying to improve their communities, which, in turn, makes it harder for leaders to address the problems. Reading more fat and protein helps people consider the complexities of problems and be open to new, sometimes slow-moving but ultimately successful, solutions.

Also, I find that reading classics, although not always fun in the moment, can make life more fun because references to these classics are everywhere, and now I feel like I am in on an inside joke.

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts